Naked Budgeting – The Economy Just Made Your Comp Budget a Lot Skinnier…

Hey!! All you HR and Recruiting pros out there in America… Times are tight, no question… Snuggled up to the friendly Finance and Accounting pros in your organization?  If not, you should… Here's a little snigglet to make sure you have enough duckets to fund all the hyped pay-for-performance initiatives you are cooking up in the test tube you call a laptop…

The budget model?  It matters. 

Duhhhhh, you say.  You get the budget.  Hold on there, Donald Trump, because I'm not talking about theTurnover_factor fact you have all the salaries loaded into the budget.  I'm talking about the FORMULAS the Finance quants are using underneath the names and the numbers. 

The big one you need to be aware of is this – Does your comp budget model have a Turnover Factor, or do the funds vacated by positions that are vacant remain in the comp budget, available for proper use?

It matters a lot.  A turnover factor projects the amount of turnover a company/division/department is going to have during the budget year, then automatically reduces payroll by the appropriate amount.  The logic used when putting a turnover factor in the budget is that those funds should be unavailable in the budget since there won't actually be PEOPLE in those jobs (for that time period).

Details, details….

The effect of the Turnover Factor?  Your compensation budget gets a lot tighter, and you'll have a lot more variances to explain month to month.  And that kind of stinks… But it's actually the right way to do it from a business perspective…

Additionally, the Turnover Factor puts a LOT of pressure on the pay-for-performance system.  Have a lot of managers who have a hard time telling low-performing employees they're not doing that hot with no raise or a limited increase?  A turnover factor means you are dealing with a truly zero-sum game.  For every dollar your manager gives to a low performer, he won't be able to give that dollar to the star. 

Especially if you have a Turnover Factor – because there's no built in slush fund.  Budget 4% for increases?  With a Turnover Factor in play, that's exactly what you have – with your active employees.  Without the TF in play, you've got some wiggle room from a budget perspective.

The turnover factor's even more important than ever in a down economy, because few companies are taking the normal path with NEW budgeted headcount.  The economy's down, so that means that most companies are budgeting for zero, or very limited headcount growth from a FTE perspective.

Which means your built in slush fund is even tighter, especially if you have a turnover factor.

So give your Finance pro a pound today and learn more.  As your company grows, the Turnover Factor is a way of life, but maybe you can delay it a little bit longer.  Remember – you're doing it for the PEOPLE – and who could blame you for that? 

At the very least, take your financial analyst to lunch and tell them your turnover will be next to zero, which means you'll benefit from any vacant spots above your stated turnover level.

It'll be money well spent…

FOT Background Check

Kris Dunn
 Kris Dunn is Chief Human Resources Officer at Kinetix and a blogger at The HR Capitalist and the Founder and Executive Editor of Fistful of Talent. That makes him a career VP of HR, a blogger, a dad and a hoops junkie, the order of which changes based on his mood. Tweet him @kris_dunn. Oh, and in case you hadn't heard the good word, he's also jumped into the RPO game as part owner of a rising shop out of ATL, Kinetix. Not your mama's recruiting process outsourcing, that's for sure... check 'em out.

2 Comments

  1. Meg Bear says:

    did you nail it or what? I can only say this, in my past life our systems would often lag and I would absolutely capitalize on that turnover factor (also extended leaves can work as well). Now our systems are so rock solid I no longer have this kind of wiggle room. Good news is that most companies are probably skipping raises this year anyway so we got that going for us (which is nice).

    Reply
  2. Kris Dunn says:

    Meg -
    I thought you would like this one. The sand in the budget, it’s passed through our fingers. It’s gone. Zero margins/room for error/opportunity.
    KD

    Reply

Leave a Comment