When Another Policy Isn’t the Answer…

I was brainstorming the other evening with a pal of mine about her organization’s social media presence – check out the Red Wiggler Farm. (And give to their capital campaign if you feel compelled!) Red Wiggler is a not-for-profit community farm outside of the DC area that employs adults with developmental disabilities and provides horticulture therapy and vocational training. Their mission is amazing… and of course, they also grow awesome vegetables.

Red Wiggler is a small organization with a huge contingency of volunteers, but they only employ 5 full-timeOld_yeller staff who actually manage the farm operations, and they have 8 on their board of directors. Needless to say, they don’t have an HR pro on their team but like all organizations, they do face the occasional people problem. They’re all human after all, and humans… well, we all have our complexities and issues, don’t we? When you don’t have your trusty neighborhood HR pro to go run to though, what are you to do? And think about how many other organizations are in this same position?

Our social media chat led to a general discussion about what people related challenges they face – and somehow, we got to talking about policies. The farm founder felt that they needed to formalize and establish more policies and specifically, he mentioned wanting to establish a policy about pets in the workplace. And I wanted to learn more because my knee jerk reaction was confusion – does a small organization of 5 employees really need a lot of policies – and specifically, a policy to address pets at work? And as a farm… bringing your dog to work would seem like a non-issue. Put the dog in the barn, or set him free to run around in the fields. Things weren’t adding up, so I dug into the issue a bit more. Here’s a summary of the facts I learned:

  • One team member has a dog whom she loves dearly. She’d like to bring him to work with her because it would make her happy, and because it would allow her not to rush home to let the dog out to do his doggy business.
  • Another team member doesn’t like having the dog at the farm. She is a dog owner though.
  • Red Wiggler has one “office” at the farm. It’s a shared space where several could be working at the same time including the two mentioned above.
  • Red Wiggler sits on about 290 acres of land.
  • Children visit the farm occasionally. Some have been scared by a dog on the loose.
  • Adults with developmental disabilities work at the farm. Some have been intimidated by a dog on the loose.
  • There’s conflict because the two team members mentioned above each have very strong opinions on whether the pooch should be allowed to come to the farm.
  • The farm founder wants each of his staff to be happy and fulfilled. And he’s a dog lover.

Like any conflict, it’s hard to distill the entire story into a series of bullet points, but think about that set of facts and then answer this – does this seem like reason for a policy? No one is necessarily doing anything “wrong” in this situation, although perhaps there could be potential for some harm given the children and adults with developmental disabilities who are around… so maybe you could construct a policy to address keeping children and the adults with developmental disabilities safe. But in a workplace of 5 people – is a policy on bringing pets to work really the answer?

My sense was that at the root of this problem and conflict, there was actually a communication issue. I asked if it were possible to have the two team members in conflict with each other, who both have in common the fact that they own dogs (and presumptively, both like them greatly), talk to each other – like really talk to each other… could this issue could be resolved? Could they reach a consensus between the two of them on what is allowable and not allowable?

Often, I think this is exactly what your typical employee relations issue boils down to. There’s a conflict about dogs at work, copy machine usage, cc-ing each other on emails too much or too infrequently – you name it. It can be a small farm of 5 employees or a large multinational company with 20,000 employees… but you have two people who are disagreeing or seeing a situation through different lenses, and likely, neither has done anything “wrong” per se, yet it’s become a conflict, and no one is comfortable talking about the situation. But talking – and listening carefully – is usually what seems to make a helluva difference. And this is what I pushed my friends at Red Wiggler to move towards. Don’t create a policy – that’s not the problem. Maybe figure out an area to fence in the dogs, or put them on leashes during key times… but make the staff talk to each other and come to agreement on what makes sense.

And you? Maybe you too can help your small business owner friends or relatives through their people management issues. They don’t always have the resources to turn to, and you can give back by talking – and really listening – through the issue.

FOT Background Check

Jessica Lee
Jessica Lee is director of digital talent strategy for Marriott International. In this newly minted role, she leads their talent related digital and social media efforts for the Marriott International family of brands... which means she blogs, tweets and plays on Facebook all day. Kind of. In what she'll quickly tell you is her dream job, JLee is working to differentiate and position Marriott to most effectively optimize innovative technologies to address the brand's business needs in the talent space.  Check out the baseline of what Marriott has done on Facebook, or in this profile via Fortune Magazine in which they are called out as a social media star. Pretty freaking cool what they've done already... and she'll work to take it even further to the next level. Don't be fooled by that fancy pants digital stuff though, she's still an everyday HR gal in the trenches at the core. SPHR certified, a decade or so into trench HR life... she can whip up a corrective action plan or source for your purple squirrel in a heartbeat. Talk to Jessica via EmailLinkedInTwitter or Facebook... See Jessica's riffs and rants on Fistful of Talent here...

3 Comments

  1. Policies should be reserved for issues that are likely to recur or have serious safety or legal implications. I think pets in the workplace qualifies on both fronts, though. (Who is liable if the pet bites someone, for example? Or if the pet gets hurt?) In such a small company, why not have the interested workers craft the policy themselves? You get the benefits of communication, as well as a set of guidelines that people can point to in future conflicts.
    Arguing over cc’s, though? People, just talk to each other.

    Reply
  2. Kim Bailey says:

    My knee jerk reaction is to say….good grief, let’s not policy everything to death! Just tell her if she can or can’t have it and go from there. However, after the knee jerk subsided, I thought that the suggestion above from Mary Ellen might be good. Have the EMPLOYEES draft a policy (or just call it guideline if you want) then the final word is the managers. More buy it/less time on the manager’s part dealing with this sideline issue.

    Reply
  3. I can’t think of a single person who abhors policy more than I do, for several reasons. So before I digress, I think there should be a policy on this issue. And, as an owner of two dogs, I’m afraid the easiest solution is for the personal pets to stay home.
    Though the farm has plenty of space, and a fenced in area could be provided, there’s a high likelihood of pet trying to dominate another. Then you’ll have another issue to resolve – with what, another policy?
    People are there to work, not watch their pets. Farm animals are a different matter, and farm dogs are treated differently than personal pets. Farm dogs have work to do, and at the end of the day when everyone goes home, they stay behind.

    Reply

Leave a Comment