Would You Guarantee A Job?

assurnace

Beginning in January 2009, Hyundai (the automotive company) started a program where if you bought one of their vehicles, then lost your job, they would buy back the vehicle from you. Basically, giving you a guarantee of safety – and helping calm buyers’ fear of making such a big purchase commitment during one of the most rocky economic times that most people have ever faced (and hopefully will ever).  Hyundai announced last month that they will end there Hyundai Assurance program, because the improving economy no longer makes this necessary to sell their vehicles. During the programs run, 350 people took advantage of the guarantee and returned their car, Hyundai sales over this period were up over 11%, while every other major automotive company had negative sales.

So, what does this have to do with jobs?

There are many companies right now struggling to find great talent (especially in the technical, IT and Engineering arenas) and one of the main reasons they are struggling is because people are somewhat reluctant to leave their current positions for a new job because of what they have seen over the past three years. So, would you, as an employer, be willing to guarantee your Jobs?

It’s an interesting question, isn’t it? I think most HR pros (and their Legal teams!) would have the initial reaction, like… “HELL NO!” Right?  But if you stop and really think about it, what could you guarantee, or for how long would you guarantee? It’s really all about Return on Investment (ROI) and how sure you are about your hiring/selection process.

Let me give you an example: Let’s say I have a need for a top level IT Developer. My need is in middle America somewhere, not an IT hotbed. I can get people interested, but relocation to an area with no other jobs than mine freaks most people out at this level. My options are either pay a crazy amount of money (basically over-pay for talent, which rarely works out) or shop the work out to an IT shop (which can get expensive, there’s less control, you become reliant, etc.). And before you tell me the other 10 things we can do – just play along with this example. Both ideas cost me a bunch of money. Now, if I was to go to that developer and offer them a Guaranteed position, in writing, for one year, do you think that would make a difference to a few people?

Let’s face it, HR Pros write guaranteed job contracts all the time – when is the last time you hired an executive that didn’t have 12 to 24 months guarantee? In fact, let me give you a little Recruiter tip:

If you are able to get an executive to sign your offer, without a guarantee/protection of time – you have the wrong executive.

So, if we can do this for executives, why can’t we do this for our extremely hard to fill jobs? You can. But why don’t we do it? Here is where the rubber meets the road in HR – HR Pros won’t talk the powers-that-be into these types of agreements because they’ll be held accountable if it doesn’t work out. At the end of the day, most HR Pros aren’t confident enough in their own selection programs to put their own butt on the line to offer a job guarantee. The truth stings a little.

If you were sure you hired great talent, that fit your organizations culture – you wouldn’t be concerned with offering someone a one year job guarantee – heck, you might even be able to offer them one for even longer.  But the fact is, we as HR Pros don’t because we don’t want to go back to our executives and tell them we don’t have an exact science – in the end, we are still just throwing a dart and hoping that it will stick.

FOT Background Check

Tim Sackett
Tim Sackett SPHR, is the ultimate Mama’s Boy!  After 15+ years of successfully leading HR and Talent Acquisition departments for Fortune 500s and smaller technical firms, Tim took over running the contingent staffing firm HRU Technical Resources in Lansing, MI. Serving as the Executive Vice President, Tim runs the company his mother started over 30 years ago, and don’t tell Mom, but he thinks he does a better job at it than she did!  Check out his blog at www.timsackett.com. Because he's got A LOT to say, and FOT just isn't enough for him.

4 Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    Tim,
    Nice post. Just to be clear on something, though — shopping work out to a sub is the same as overpaying for talent. If the later rarely works out, why is the former any better?
    Second, yes, perhaps employers could potentially work towards guarantees. At my company (government contractor) we just won a huge contract that’s supposed to significantly increase the size of our company. We even hired a recruiter to handle all of the work. About six months later, we laid that person off because the contracts weren’t coming in as fast as we expected, so we haven’t had any hiring to do. I’m happy where I’m at — so if you want me to come and work for you, you have to make it worth my while. And because I really don’t know your business, I need to mitigate the risk that you screwed up and over-hired.

    Reply
  2. Emily says:

    Yes, if I could have guaranteed 1 year on that job…I might have gotten a bite :)

    Reply
  3. Joel Kimball says:

    No. Too volatile an environment – and industry – and I don’t have any talent I need that bad. If I got as hard up for engineers as I did back in the early 90′s, and was smokin’ 200 engrs in at a clip?
    Then yeah.
    Now – not so much…

    Reply
  4. Just to be clear on one thing, even if the job of sourcing outside of the submarine is the same as overpaying for talent. Later, if rarely works, why the former best?

    Reply

Leave a Comment