Succession at Your Company: Why the Young and the Old Secretly Hate Each Other

anchorman

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about my own mortality.  I’ve also been thinking a lot about why succession sucks.  Like duh.   It’s not that we lack the skills, processes and/or software for proper succession.  It’s that the conversation at its very core is an emotional Beirut for all parties involved.  We’re all avoiding the concept of… dude, your time is up.  Succession just sucks, so let’s explore that.

Folks, get comfortable with the concept of generational warfare.  IMO, we all have institutional blood on our hands.  Some of us are kind of graceful but more often than not… we don’t want to let go of the helm.  I would imagine that this has been going on since the beginning of time.  Young versus old, progressive versus traditional, abstraction versus realism, etc.  It’s rooted in a bloodlust for power… the attainment of power and/or the retention of power.

Funny thing is… transitions happen.  Change happens.  Shit happens.  Any given generation is only at the helm for a limited amount of time.  Yep, the circle of life… ahhh Simba (poor Mufasa).  No – the other circle of life, meaning the moment one generation takes the helm… is the very moment the clock starts on their retirement.  Go ahead and plan the party, you power hungry bastards.  Time is of the essence – errr, time is fleeting.  We just don’t have enough time.

Come to think of it… can succession really ever be humane?  No.  Not really.  The three potential scenarios play out like this…

  • Playing the part of the elder statesman… you choose to leave.  Secretly the younger generation has wanted you out for years.  They’ve barely been able to tolerate you.  The poison darts of wisdom and all.  F**k it to hell… “will you just exit the firm?” they think to themselves..
  • Playing the part of the young buck… they force you to leave.  That’s right; I’m here to fire you Jerry.  You feel like you still have some gas in the tank.  The younger generation doesn’t care about your gas… real or imagined.
  • We mutually decide to part ways.  Horseshit.  The “departure” was originated somewhere… chicken or egg but not both.

Feel the rage just beneath the surface of succession.  IMO, rage is always present… whether or not we want to acknowledge it is up to us.  The succession conversation is inherently wrought with pain.  Pain = growth.  Not that growth is good or bad, just inevitable.  Again, a change is gonna come.  Let me suggest a new direction for those who care deeply about succession both in terms of process and substance.

Okay, drum roll please… age specific mandatory retirement.  Yep, you read that correctly.  I want to take the hemming and hawing out of the process.  On your birthday, things happen.  In this example, when you turn 63, you effectively sign a new employment contract.  The details:

  • At age 63, your schedule is reduced to 32 hours per week w/benefits
  • At age 64, your schedule is reduced to 24 hours per week, no benefits – essentially, you are a part time employee from now on
  • At age 65, your schedule is reduced to 16 hours per week
  • At age 66, your schedule is reduced to 8 hours per week
  • At age 67, you are permanently retired from the firm

Maybe you get a gold watch or some other thankless gesture…  Not sure.  But, older employees would be “gracefully” phased out over years.  The ages can change, but you get the point.  Not a lot of discussion.  Once you hit a certain age, you’re on a predetermined retirement path of reduced hours / responsibilities.  In my fictitious world, either party could move the time table up given 60 days notice but neither party could slow the process down.

The handoff is what really matters.  I think we want way too much from the retiring generation.  We want them to somehow tell us all the secrets.  Truth is, they made it up as they went along… just as the younger generation will do.  Let’s focus on the critical information to be exchanged from one generation to another.  Personally, I want the older generation to convey important cultural events and explain the context of said events.  Through their eyes, I want to know how they saw the firm mature.  I also want to know all about the failures of the firm.  From every perspective, I want to know the details and context to failures.  That’s about it.

In my opinion, everything else can be learned – on the job – by the younger generation.  I want the general history lesson – via story telling – and in particular, I want a deep dive in to the failures… so, at the very least, the younger generation won’t repeat those.  I don’t want much, I don’t expect much and the truth is, we can find a way for this to NOT kick our ass so much.

For a nanosecond, let’s put our egos aside.  The baton being passed is the only thing that is really important.  We can bond upwardly and/or downwardly and actually give a shit enough to convey critical things or NOT.  The choice is ours.  All of ours.  If we really care about our legacy, then succession will be easy AND graceful.

FOT Background Check

William Tincup
WILLIAM TINCUP, SPHR. William is the CEO of HR consultancy Tincup & Co. William is one of the country’s leading thinkers on social media application for human resources, an expert on adoption of HR technology and damn fine marketer. William has been blogging about HR related issues since 2007. He’s a contributor to Fistful of Talent, HRTechEurope and HRExaminer and also co-hosts a daily HR podcast called DriveThruHR. Tweet him @williamtincup and check him out on Facebook and LinkedIn. Not up to speed in the social media game? Reach out via email. William serves on the Board of Advisors for Insynctive, Causecast, Work4Labs, PeopleReport, Jurify, TrackMaven, SocialEars, AppLearn, StrengthsInsight, The Workforce Institute, PeopleMatter, SmartRecruiters, Ajax Workforce Marketing and is a 2013 Council Member for The Candidate Experience Awards. He also serves on the Board of Directors for Chequed and is a startup mentor for Acceleprise. William is a graduate of the University of Alabama of Birmingham with a BA in Art History. He also earned a MA from the University of Arizona and a MBA from Case Western Reserve University.

4 Comments

  1. I think you hit it on the head…it’s about putting our egos aside. If we can keep the organization and the mission in mind, we can truly act civil and in a way that respects everyone’s interests. Great post.

    Reply
  2. I had a very viseral reaction to this and it has not subsided. My reaction to this is I am not interested in passing the baton to you if you force me to leave. I am going to be more interested in shoving it up your a$$ and telling you to figure it out by yourself. If I continue to have something to offer regardless of my age why should I give it up? Sorry, but I am employed by Me,Inc. and that is the organization I have ultimate loyalty to. If you can show me I am useless I may listen and move on. But until I have emperical proof it isn’t happening.

    Reply
  3. It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.

    Reply
  4. Michael Haberman’s comment was very telling. It reminds me of politicians talking about term limits. Most support them, until it comes their time. No one wants to feel replaceable or “used up.” There has to be a better way to keep the older generations active in the workforce while allowing the new generations to move up the ranks.

    Reply

Leave a Comment