Usually my rants move from topic to topic and I was ready to move on, until I learned last week that it’s unlikely any of us at FOT (especially Sackett after his Casey Anthony post) will ever find a job again. That’s right, let me introduce you to Social Intelligence, the next fad in recruitment! For a fee, they’ll go out and do the online equivalent of digging through your trash and assemble a dossier of everything a prospective employee has said or done online in the past seven years. Great, I can’t wait until I have to explain to a prospective employer in the future why I wear short-shorts around the office. You can check out the article here in the NY Times of all places.
What bothers me about this service is that it’s built on the assumption that knowing what everything
someone has said or done online will somehow help you make better hiring decisions. I think it will do nothing more that confuse your hiring process at best and open you up to a lawsuit at worst. Why? Because we should all know better by now that hiring is a complex business filled with opportunities for subjectivity and mistakes. But I do think there are 3 key things you can do in order to help improve your hiring decisions, all of which don’t include digging through an online trash heap:
1. Understand where your talent really comes from: No, I don’t mean what websites or social media sites a candidate “found” about your company. There’s very little competitive advantage to that approach in my opinion. Rather, if you’re going to build a dossier, why not build one on all of your top performers? Look into their past – where did they train? Who did they train with? Where did they go to school? What you’re looking for are patterns. Maybe there’s a common link to a person or advisor in their past. That’ts who you should be building a relationship with if you want to build your pipeline.
2. Throw out your hiring competency models: Look, I understand the potential value or having well thought out competency models in place to help guide EVERYTHING you do in a company. But, it’s time spent in the wrong place. The fact of the matter is, most of us are really bad interviewers and will accept the most generic of answers a candidate gives us. Then we recommend/don’t recommend hiring based on essentially no data. The real leverage point here is providing an opportunity for your interviewers to practice their skills over and over when the stakes are low until they get better. No competency model, no matter how well researched, can replace a good interviewer.
3. Get the team involved: If I believed in silver bullets, this would be mine. I can do everything in the book to make a solid hiring choice, but if the team they are about to join was a) not involved in the process, or b) isn’t committed to making the new hire successful, it’s game over. Once an employee walks throught the door, it’s no longer about the hiring process. Rather, it’s about how the team supports the new person to be successful. This is what truly drives success. In my opinion.
Now, if you think what I just wrote is a bunch of b.s., that’s ok. Don’t hire me in the future. I know I could always go get a job with Sackett!

























AP -
I’ll hire you in a second! But only if you wear the short-short around the office. I think our only hope is we just start an FOT HR Consulting firm!
T
A discrimination claim can only be moments away
Tim – I bet there is a pic out there of you with not only the short-shorts, but with the Richard Simmons ‘shows way too much than it should’ tank top!
I agree with you 100% on point 3! It doesn’t matter how great the new hire may be in the interview, there will be an immediate split and “taking of sides” if the team isn’t involved or interested in the hire. It is amazing how much common sense this simple point carries yet is overlooked so often!
Somewhat I agree with Adambogren, but the question is why team members sometime don’t want to get involved with new hire? As a employee, I think, mostly new hired guns are usually come through big references and mostly they are expert, “the one who knows more and more about less and less until they knows utterly everything about nothing.” Its all starts from there……
Andy,
I attended Aberdeen’s Summit back in March in NY and I recognized your unconventional style in this article as well. Great points and it’s refreshing to see that a VP actually involves his or her team in the hiring process.
Paula Thorby