A Better Formula for Calculating Severance Amounts

Terminating employees sucks. But everyone has to do it from time to time. One way to soften the blow of an exit notification is the offer of severance. Not only does a severance agreement buy you a commitment from the departing employee not to sue, but it also provides some helpful support to employees as they pursue their next steps. The higher the severance, the more support you’re providing, and so the easier the message becomes. The lower the severance, the more the company saves. So the question becomes: what’s the right amount of severance to offer?

As a rule of thumb, many companies link severance packages to tenure (e.g., 2 weeks of base salary for every year at the company). This has never made sense to me. If one of the major purposes of severance is to support an employee while he looks for his next job, then shouldn’t the amount of severance be linked to how much support he needs? Instead, this tenure-based formula is inverted: those who have been at your company a short time will have a harder time finding their next gig, because they’ll have to explain this pit-stop, yet they’ll get less support.

I think severance packages should be based on factors that include 1) how many chances did the employee have to save his job, 2) how long is it likely to take the employee to find something new, and 3) how much of the employee’s base salary is he likely to need for living expenses. You should have a standard formula to start with. Here’s a suggestion:

  • Start with 12 weeks, since few people can find a job in less than that time.
  • Then, reduce 1 week for every clear conversation the employee had about his performance problems and the need for immediate change. The idea is the employee was given a sort of notice each time you had this discussion with him.
  • Hopefully you’ve had at least 1-2 of these conversations.
  • If the employee was laid off for non-performance reasons, this would be a reduction of 0 weeks
  • Controversial: Add or subtract up to 2 weeks depending on how hard this sort of job will be to get in another company (e.g., a Biostatistician in Biotech is in-demand right now, so perhaps take a couple weeks off the severance; a Recruiter during a downturn will have a tougher time, so perhaps add up to 2 weeks).
  • Even more controversial: If the employee earns >$150K, subtract a week. >$250K, subtract 2 weeks. >$350K, subtract 3 weeks, etc. Reason is that the higher the income, the lower the portion of his income that goes to day-to-day living expenses. You want to support your former employee in finding his next gig, but you don’t have to pay for his weekend jaunts to Vegas while you’re at it.

Here’s an example: Jake earns $250K and has been given clear performance warnings 2x before his termination as an Accountant. He’d get 12 weeks minus 2 weeks for warnings, minus 2 more weeks for wealth = 8 weeks. In this case, I make no adjustments for the job because Accounting jobs are neither hot nor cold right now. Note that whether Jake’s been here 2 months or 2 years, he’d get 8 weeks of severance. This is your starting point, and then of course you have to adjust upward or downward depending on how badly you need that signature protecting yourself against a lawsuit, and any other particular circumstances of the situation. This strikes me as a better formula than one that is tenure-based. Don’t reward people for sticking around longer in a job that’s a poor fit. Instead, offer severance aimed at helping support people while they find their next steps.

FOT Background Check

Ben Olds
Ben works in HR/OD at Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, a Cambridge company dedicated to the simple goal of trying to cure cancer… no big deal! Ben’s on his second career, having spent his first in business/strategy consulting, mostly with Bain & Co and Monitor Group, which basically just means he relies on MS Excel to solve virtually any problem he faces. If he’s not coaching or working with colleagues on their approach to leadership, he’s helping teams create effective dynamics or planning a recognition program to motivate employees. And sometimes, he’s chasing his wife around the ice hockey rink in his weekly pick-up game, or playing tennis, squash, skiing, hiking, mountain biking, or anything else to expend his nervous energy!


  1. Much better working philosophy than most companies use. Love this!

  2. Good blog! I truly love how it is easy on my eyes and the data are well written. I’m wondering how I could be notified when a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your RSS feed which must do the trick! Have a nice day!|

  3. Stephany Jones says:

    Severance should be calculated with good care. I have heard from my friends who deals with employment law related charges at http://www.monteithbaker.com/practice-areas/civil-litigation/employment-law-including-wrongful-dismissal/ that severance related issues are one of the most common ones employers face after firing an employee. If proper severance is given, company may be able to manage,even if the firing the employee is not entirely legal hoping the employee is not angry. In another case, giving too much severance may cause another problem. It may even motivate some employees, to try and get fired and no company wants that.

Comments are now closed for this article.

Contact Us | Hire FOT to Speak | About FOT